Wednesday, 27 July 2011
Do checklist before go for the next step
Monday, 25 July 2011
Topic Discussion 4.
Sunday, 24 July 2011
Bloggers Are Journalists - Vice Versa?
So, nowadays, the technique have changed. Journalists like freelancer prefer sharing their research through net such as Blogger which have become an important element in our daily life. So, this means that not all bloggers are journalist. Those who don't write about their daily life but do research and document their experiences, fact and element such as about politics, economy and social of a country or world can be know as journalist even though they are bloggers. Based on my opinion, NOT ALL BLOGGERS ARE JOURNALISTS BUT ALL JOURNALISTS CAN BE BLOGGERS. It just depends on what the bloggers document on their web profile to share it to the community. As long as bloggers have their own research, facts, evidence and so on about his issues which he document in the website, he can be known as journalist or more towards freelancer journalist.
Obvious Distinction
Journalists are those people that write and get their work published while working under a newspaper or magazine company. Bloggers are those people that write and get their work published on the net.
So the big question here, are bloggers journalists?![]()

Journalists have somehow become a joke now with the existence of bloggers
Unfortunately, no, I don’t think so. Unlike journalist, bloggers write to their heart content about a topic, no restriction, no limitation whatsoever. Whileas journalists, they have certain ethics, certain limitation provided by their editors – sometimes their article could be cut in half if the editors want it to be. For me, that much shows the difference between the two; the freedom in writing I mean.
Journalists are often writing news or article under the influence and pressure of their company or affiliated parties like we see in the movie Green Hornet. In the movie, the newspaper company owned by the Reid family was pressured to write biased articles. Or like in Harry Potter, where Rita Skeeter, the journalist, manipulates and write wrong facts in her article.
While bloggers write as they like, no pressure whatsoever. 
No pressure obviously.
But, that doesn’t mean bloggers aren’t biased either. Both journalists and bloggers may provide false facts and it is up to us to decide whether it’s wrong or right.
Who's right?


Bloggers: Journalists without Paychecks.
'A journalist collects and disseminates information about current events, people,trends, and issues'
My take on this topic is that bloggers; the everyday person who sits behind his computer and airs his opinion on topics that he finds interesting, could be considered journalists since they do satisfy the definition of the very word in question; Journalist.
*With respect to the fact that the information should be conveyed through mass media, otherwise that would mean that even a person holding a conversation with another person would be considered journalism*
![]() |
| (proffesional journalist) |
The only difference, in my opinion, is that Bloggers most of the time express their personal opinions, don't do it for money and regard the sharing of information as passion or something they feel they were born to do. Journalists on the other hand are paid, consider it a work and most of the times their personal opinion may or may not be aired due to company propaganda.
The question is that should the latter only be considered a journalists only because they're paid? In my opinion the mere definition of the word suggests that it is the critical analysis along with the distribution of the information that makes one a journalist and not his or her's paycheck.








